[as112-ops] IPv6 + AS112?

[Joe Abley]

On 2013-06-26, at 01:25, Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org> wrote:

> On Jun 25, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Jonathan Stewart <jonathan.stewart at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Joe Abley <jabley at hopcount.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> Until there is a zone delegated to blackhole-3 or blackhole-4, right.
>> I notice that the hostnames resolve, but it's the ip6.arpa delegations which are not there.
>> 
>> So pardon my ignorance, but what would it take to turn this on?  A decision by the IANA?  An RFC about the IPv6 aspects of AS112?
> 
> We added the host names last week. We are currently looking into identifying who the relevant people are who need to consent in order for delegations to be made.

There would be no such problem to solve if the AAAA records were simply added to blackhole-1 and blackhole-2 (in the sense that the existing AS112 zones would immediately be reachable over IPv6).

As far as adding new zones to AS112, that's an open problem and there are two approaches being discussed in dnsop. It's quite premature to add more delegations right now, I would say (and such an action would likely result in Bad Things since there's no practical way to coordinate the add/drop of zones on AS112 servers right now, and lame delegations would certainly result.)


Joe