[as112-ops] IPv6 network block for AS112 and experiments
Clement Cavadore
clement at cavadore.net
Thu Jul 14 18:50:03 UTC 2011
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 14:33 -0400, William F. Maton wrote:
> Clement: I don't think it's any harm, as it will be interesting to see to
> which path the IPv6 traffic settles on for its destination. :-)
Great. Regarding the node we run @Hivane/34019, we are in the process of
connecting it directly to some parisian IXes. At the moment, we have
contacted FranceIX, Equinix-Paris, and Sfinx, and FranceIX accepted the
connexion.
> It might be a useful exercise to map out where the traffic borderlines are
> with the two nodes currently reachable via IPv6. I had forgotten that one
> of the IPv6 upstreams for my node is CANARIE, which then went off and get
> free IPv6 transit for itself and downstreams, so I only expected to get as
> far as the research networks.
How do you think to proceed ? Using various lg/route-servers ?
> The DNS-OARC presnetation from a couple of years ago about locating AS112
> nodes had a couple of slides that demonstrated odd paths and why having
> more AS112 nodes closer to their bad-boy sources is a bonus.
It sure may be a bonus. However, routing seems to be weird. For example,
in Paris, we receive almost much traffic from... .kr ! :-)
Regards,
--
Clément Cavadore
French Froggie
More information about the as112-ops
mailing list