[as112-ops] RFC4193 section 4.4

[Paul Vixie]

> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:30:26 -0500 (EST)
> From: "William F. Maton" <wmaton at ottix.net>
> 
> What would be the steps to prod DNS-OARC into getting additional resources
> (given the apparent IPv4 run-out) if we went down this path?

ask <wayne at dns-oarc.net> who is DNS-OARC's executive director, he'll figure
it out.

> I've got the seed of an I-D forming in my head, but I also remember from
> dnsop discussions some ways back of a desire by some to see some domain
> name junk go AS112's way as well, but this I realize is getting beyond
> scope.

you're welcome to leverage my old metazones idea as a way to ensure that
the next set of anycast servers is centrally controllable as to what set
of zones they serve, so that we don't have to add new servers every time
we add new zones as our only way to avoid lameness and repeat-fallback.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CBoQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fosdir.com%2Fml%2Fattachments%2Fpdf4nuG1DKVQL.pdf&rct=j&q=federated%20name%20vixie&ei=5bobTYezKo6osQOc_MiiAg&usg=AFQjCNGfJsuJZCqia0m5eJ0Wr-PP5Qy_xQ&cad=rja

it's hard to write an RFC in terms of perl scripts though (i've tried.)