[as112-ops] RFC4193 section 4.4

[Eric Ziegast]

Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193

Is there any (blasphemous) interest in running a global "c.f.ip6.arpa"
or "d.f.ip6.arpa" nameserver as a part of AS112?

It might be interesting to compare traffic levels between the current
traffic as IPV6 adoption spreads.  It might also help people catch
leaky nameserver misconfigurations that are violating the RFC.

--
Eric Ziegast

On 12/27/10 12:52 PM, kevin brintnall wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:05:32AM -0800, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>> Happy new year everyone!
>>
>> I am just a curious geek , so I want to ask, does anyone see over 5Kqps
>> per location with their AS112 install?
> 
> A few years back, we used to get an average of 5-6 kq/sec, but not we're
> hovering around 2kq/s.  Interestingly, our peak (9kq/s) hasn't changed
> much over the years.  We announce our AS112 instance (as112.qwest.net)
> globally.
> 
> I think the drop is partially due to the built-in empty zones feature
> in newer versions of BIND[1].
>