From wmaton at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca  Wed Oct  8 23:30:25 2008
From: wmaton at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (William F. Maton Sotomayor)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:30:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [as112-ops] AS112 IETF drafts status; request for stats.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810080929160.11081@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>


Greetings all,

A couple of notes:

-I will be making an update on the AS112 drafts, specifically the
  -help-help document for the IETF as they have both slipped under the waves
  and I want to revive them.

-Statistics.... I will be making a column on the 'registry' of AS112
  nodes to make distinct those AS112 sites who have furnished publically
  visible stats for their AS112 nodes.  As some of you may recall, there
  was a agreement by the first AS112 providers to post stats... Same needs
  to be done for the more recent AS112 operators please.  So don't be shy
  and let me know what the link is to your graphs.  Please and thanks.

-Speaking of AS112 nodes, Evan Wright of CERT/CC gave an interesting
  presentation at DNS-OARC Ottawa about detecting AS112 nodes that our
  group of operators here may not know about.  Details about his findings
  can be found here:

 	https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/workshop-2008/agenda

  It's on the second day of the gathering.

Thanks all,

wfms

From wmaton at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca  Sun Oct 26 10:31:11 2008
From: wmaton at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (William F. Maton Sotomayor)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:31:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [as112-ops] aut-num objects for AS112
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810260625220.7898@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>


Greetings all,

 	I started looking at how I could automate my config for a couple 
of route servers at the Ottawa Internet Exchange when I came across the 
following entries for the AS112 aut-num object:

aut-num:        AS112
as-name:        ROOTSERV
descr:          Root Server Technical Operations Assn
descr:          See: http://www.as112.net/
descr:          $Id: aut-num:AS112,v 1.5 2007/09/23 06:08:02 liman Exp $
import:         from AS3277 action pref=100; accept ANY
import:         from AS3292 action pref=100; accept ANY
import:         from AS8763 action pref=100; accept ANY
import:         from AS8674 action pref=100; accept ANY
import:         from AS12041 action pref=100; accept ANY
import:         from AS12779 action pref=100; accept ANY
import:         from AS15431 action pref=100; accept ANY
import:         from AS16150 action pref=100; accept ANY
export:         to AS3277 announce AS112
export:         to AS3292 announce AS112
export:         to AS8763 announce AS112
export:         to AS8674 announce AS112
export:         to AS12041 announce AS112
export:         to AS12779 announce AS112
export:         to AS15431 announce AS112
export:         to AS16150 announce AS112
admin-c:        LL10-RIPE
tech-c:         LL10-RIPE
mnt-by:         DGIX-MNT
changed:        liman at autonomica.se 20021217
changed:        liman at autonomica.se 20050504
changed:        liman at autonomica.se 20070614
changed:        liman at autonomica.se 20070923
source:         RIPE

aut-num:    AS112
as-name:    ISC-AS112
descr:      Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
admin-c:    PV15-ARIN
tech-c:     SHS-ARIN
remarks:    contacts per RFC2142:
remarks:    Abuse / UCE reports  abuse at as112.net
remarks:    Security issues      noc at as112.net
mnt-by:     MAINT-ISC
changed:    jabley at isc.org 20040101
source:        NTTCOM

So it looks like I'll have to generate another duplicate.  But, aside from 
that, is the above really a problem?  Or am I overly woried over objects 
in an IRR that isn't that heavily used? :-)

Thanks,

wfms

From nick at inex.ie  Mon Oct 27 11:31:09 2008
From: nick at inex.ie (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:31:09 +0000
Subject: [as112-ops] aut-num objects for AS112
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810260625220.7898@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810260625220.7898@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
Message-ID: <4905A67D.6050904@inex.ie>

On 26/10/2008 10:31, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> So it looks like I'll have to generate another duplicate. But, aside
> from that, is the above really a problem? Or am I overly woried over
> objects in an IRR that isn't that heavily used? :-)

It's probably a good idea that there be some level of maintenance here.  I 
don't use the aut-sys object, but I use the RIPE IRRDB route: object for 
192.175.48.0/24 for building filters, and would be very upset if it were to 
disappear.

At least, it might be useful to ensure some level of consistency between 
the various IRRDBs.

Nick

From wmaton at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca  Mon Oct 27 11:37:49 2008
From: wmaton at ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (William F. Maton Sotomayor)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:37:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [as112-ops] aut-num objects for AS112
In-Reply-To: <4905A67D.6050904@inex.ie>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810260625220.7898@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
	<4905A67D.6050904@inex.ie>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810270736550.8638@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> It's probably a good idea that there be some level of maintenance here.  I 
> don't use the aut-sys object, but I use the RIPE IRRDB route: object for 
> 192.175.48.0/24 for building filters, and would be very upset if it were to 
> disappear.

The interesting thing is...

> At least, it might be useful to ensure some level of consistency between the 
> various IRRDBs.

...according to the RADB, there's nearly a dozen such objects registered. 
So many to chose from....

>
> Nick
>


wfms

From jabley at ca.afilias.info  Mon Oct 27 11:59:55 2008
From: jabley at ca.afilias.info (Joe Abley)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:59:55 -0400
Subject: [as112-ops] aut-num objects for AS112
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810270736550.8638@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810260625220.7898@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
	<4905A67D.6050904@inex.ie>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0810270736550.8638@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
Message-ID: <275136DC-D000-4909-8DA4-3EAB5ACEA2D9@ca.afilias.info>


On 27 Oct 2008, at 07:37, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
>> It's probably a good idea that there be some level of maintenance  
>> here.  I don't use the aut-sys object, but I use the RIPE IRRDB  
>> route: object for 192.175.48.0/24 for building filters, and would  
>> be very upset if it were to disappear.
>
> The interesting thing is...
>
>> At least, it might be useful to ensure some level of consistency  
>> between the various IRRDBs.
>
> ...according to the RADB, there's nearly a dozen such objects  
> registered. So many to chose from....

Welcome to the IRR.


Joe


