[as112-ops] Section 4.4 of RFC 4193 and AS112

[Daniele Arena]

> I am also aware of Marc Andrew's internet draft on serving local zones
> (draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-01.txt) which could also deal with 
> this issue.
> 
> However, the ultimate question I have for the AS112 operators is the 
> following:  Should the AS112 project be delegated the d.f.ip6.arpa in 
> anticipation of ULA addressing ending up in people's DNS servers?  Should 
> this be included as part of the AS112 drafts?

Looks sensible to me...

What about the other IPv6 zones mentioned in Mark's draft that might
need a "sacrificial server" (see section 4)? Should AS112 cover them as
well?

Regards,

Daniele.

-- 
Daniele Arena - NaMeX
Via dei Tizi 6/b - I-00185 Roma
Tel.: +39 06 44486313 - Fax: +39 06 4957083
http://www.namex.it/