<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 13, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Dnsbed (Jeff) <<a href="mailto:support@dnsbed.com" class="">support@dnsbed.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" class=""><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class="">
Hi,<br class="">
  <br class="">
Anyone knows this DNS server?<br class="">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.knot-dns.cz/">https://www.knot-dns.cz/</a><br class="">
  <br class="">
Their performance seems a lot better than BIND.<br class="">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.knot-dns.cz/pages/benchmark.html#tab-response-rate">https://www.knot-dns.cz/pages/benchmark.html#tab-response-rate</a><br class="">
  <br class=""></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>This seems to be true for every DNS servers that compiles answer from the zone files, like NSD started doing a while ago and then Knot and Yadifa came along also doing that. </div><div><br class=""></div><div>What I'm curios about is how we measure code diversity among those 3 platforms; would using any 2 of the 3 be diverse enough for long-term survivability, or are they too similar in architecture ? </div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Rubens</div><div><br class=""></div><br class=""></body></html>