<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jun 25, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Jonathan Stewart <<a href="mailto:jonathan.stewart@gmail.com">jonathan.stewart@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Joe Abley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jabley@hopcount.ca" target="_blank">jabley@hopcount.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto; "><div class="im"><br>
<br>
</div>Until there is a zone delegated to blackhole-3 or blackhole-4, right.<br></blockquote><div>I notice that the hostnames resolve, but it's the ip6.arpa delegations which are not there.<br><br></div><div>So pardon my ignorance, but what would it take to turn this on? A decision by the IANA? An RFC about the IPv6 aspects of AS112?<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>We added the host names last week. We are currently looking into identifying who the relevant people are who need to consent in order for delegations to be made.</div><div><br></div><div>kim</div></body></html>